httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RE-VOTE] adoption of mod_firehose MODULE
Date Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:55:03 GMT
I learned something tonight :)

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 16:30, Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> >...
> > I've often thought that modules like, say, mod_ftp, would have a much
> > greater chance of being successful if they were in trunk rather than it
> > being several additional steps to obtain.
> >
> > I'm +1 to having this in trunk, but am voting based on the community
> > aspects, rather than the technical ones. I figure the technical aspects
> will
> > work themselves out in trunk ... or they won't, and we'll drop it from a
> > release branch.
>
> Exactly. In the subversion project, we always strive to do development
> directly on trunk (rather than branches). Keeping stuff in trunk gives
> it many more eyeballs and testing. New features might be buggy on
> trunk, but "just don't use it yet" is a good response :-)
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>

Mime
View raw message