httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Kew <>
Subject Re: [RE-VOTE] adoption of mod_firehose MODULE
Date Fri, 02 Mar 2012 08:16:10 GMT

On 1 Mar 2012, at 21:27, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:

> On 3/1/2012 3:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Modules do not have to be tested *before* they appear in trunk. That's
>> putting the cart before the horse. Part of the development process
>> (while in trunk) is doing the testing portion. And hey... if it never
>> gets tested, then it gets marked as "experimental" and we all move on.
> In fact there is an modules/experimental/ tree; mod_noloris is currently
> one such module. 

Mod_noloris was a quick&dirty fix to a rather serious problem.  It was
superseded when Stefan produced a better fix, so there's no
expectation now that mod_noloris will ever 'graduate'.  I don't think
that's a model for most incoming modules!

Nick Kew

View raw message