httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>
Subject Re: log-message-tags
Date Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:43:40 GMT
hi Jim,

On 07.03.2012 00:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Oh yeah... and how do we worry about keeping things in sync. For
> example, right now trunk uses 02298 and 02299, but 2.4 does not.
> When another log entry is added to 2.4, do we use these or skip
> these???
>
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... anyone else noticing that the httpd-2.4 branch is lacking
>> the docs/log-message-tags/ dir?

I asked the question in the "Questions" thread end of January:

 >> 2) log tags
 >> ===========
 >>
 >> r1209743 | sf | 2011-12-02 23:26:54 +0100 (Fri, 02 Dec 2011) | 3
 >> lines Add APLOGNO() macro for unique tags for every log message.
 >> Add some scripts to make adding these tags easier.
 >>
 >> This has only been backported partially. The directory
 >> docs/log-message-tags is mising in 2.4.x as well as the
 >> update-log-tags and update-log-msg-tags targets in Makefile.

Stefan answered on Jan. 31st:

 > This is intentional and not for backport. The log tags should be
 > consistent between trunk and the branches, so there can be only one
 > "docs/log-message-tags/next-number" file, and that resides in trunk.
 > That means if an error message is introduced in 2.4 but not in trunk,
 > the next-number file in trunk should be updated.
 >
 > But there should probably be a docs/log-message-tags/README file in
 > 2.4 that explains this. I will write something when I have time. But
 > as a non-code change, this is not that urgent.

Regards,

Rainer

Mime
View raw message