Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of matsu1229@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.173 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of matsu1229@gmail.com designates
 10.50.85.231 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.85.231;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9829F9F1-A5B6-4898-8064-3D392F6A1B2D@jaguNET.com>
References: <000e01ccf660$8434fc20$8c9ef460$@pku.edu.cn>
	<9829F9F1-A5B6-4898-8064-3D392F6A1B2D@jaguNET.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:54:56 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CAOJgj7HxgJk-w4-qcGrGiak=qi28GLkjQqDfr2TzomUmvk1BJw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Apache 2.4.1 Throughput compared with nginx
From: MATSUMOTO Ryosuke <matsu1229@gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I entirely agree with you on your comment.

2012/3/1 Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com>:
> Why even bother... I simply posted a comment and moved on.
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Bing Swen wrote:
>
>> Some Nginx people just made a performance test with Apache 2.4.1 at
>> http://blog.zhuzhaoyuan.com/category/c10k/
>> Were the Event_MPM configuration parameters somewhere close to optimal?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bing
>>
>>
>> Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com] wrote on 2012年2月24日 20:57
>>>
>>> w00t!!!
>>>
>>> On Feb 23, 2012, at 5:26 PM, MATSUMOTO Ryosuke wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I evaluated the throughput of Apaceh 2.4.1. I compared apache(2.4.1,
>>>> 2.2.3) with nginx.
>>>> I used httperf benchmark 0.9.0 to measure thethroughput.
>>>>
>>>> http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/?p=1812
>>>>
>>>> I feel bad about writing this article in Japanese in my hurry ;)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> --
>>>> MATSUMOTO Ryosuke < matsu1229 at gmail.com >
>>>> http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/
>>>>
>>
>


-- 
MATSUMOTO Ryosuke < matsu1229 at gmail.com >
http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/