Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 76.96.30.32 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of jim@jagunet.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Subject: Re: Apache 2.4.1 Throughput compared with nginx
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
In-Reply-To: <000e01ccf660$8434fc20$8c9ef460$@pku.edu.cn>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:39:32 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9829F9F1-A5B6-4898-8064-3D392F6A1B2D@jaguNET.com>
References: <000e01ccf660$8434fc20$8c9ef460$@pku.edu.cn>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org

Why even bother... I simply posted a comment and moved on.

On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Bing Swen wrote:

> Some Nginx people just made a performance test with Apache 2.4.1 at
> http://blog.zhuzhaoyuan.com/category/c10k/
> Were the Event_MPM configuration parameters somewhere close to =
optimal?
>=20
> Regards,
> Bing
>=20
>=20
> Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com] wrote on 2012=E5=B9=B42=E6=9C=882=
4=E6=97=A5 20:57
>>=20
>> w00t!!!
>>=20
>> On Feb 23, 2012, at 5:26 PM, MATSUMOTO Ryosuke wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hi all,
>>>=20
>>> I evaluated the throughput of Apaceh 2.4.1. I compared apache(2.4.1,
>>> 2.2.3) with nginx.
>>> I used httperf benchmark 0.9.0 to measure thethroughput.
>>>=20
>>> http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/?p=3D1812
>>>=20
>>> I feel bad about writing this article in Japanese in my hurry ;)
>>>=20
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> MATSUMOTO Ryosuke < matsu1229 at gmail.com >=20
>>> http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/
>>>=20
>=20