Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2929903C for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39209 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2012 12:37:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 39158 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2012 12:37:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 39147 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2012 12:37:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:37:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.40] (HELO qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:37:07 +0000 Received: from omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.88]) by qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dQJd1i0011u4NiLA4QcmsG; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:36:46 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.91.46]) by omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dQck1i01F100q0d8hQcm8j; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:36:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: Event and simple From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:36:44 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5EE33241-46CA-4CCC-94A1-D6D86B5240D8@apache.org> References: To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Yeah, I was thinking the same thing=20 On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote: >=20 >> I hope to carve out cycles to work on the trunk rev's of event and >> simple in order to backport to 2.4... >>=20 >> Thoughts? :) >=20 > For event, I would recommend to move Paul's changes into a branch and = revert trunk to the state of 2.4. Then we can do small changes and bug = fixes in trunk and more radical changes in the branch. Of course it is = up to you on which of the two you want to work ;) >=20