Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BE9B908F for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44268 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2012 20:17:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44102 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2012 20:17:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44094 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2012 20:17:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:17:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.242.35.75] (HELO dns-factory.at) (194.242.35.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:17:00 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.33] gls@gknw.net [98.176.43.250] by dns-factory.at with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 8582 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:16:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4F396FA6.1010106@gknw.net> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:16:38 -0800 From: Gregg Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.26) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/3.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Intent to T&R 2.4.1 References: <1172CD98-E1AA-4534-A7B4-46E292B9D0EB@jaguNET.com> <4F381360.3000208@apache.org> <4F3889A0.2020204@gknw.net> <4F38D2DE.4030400@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4F38D2DE.4030400@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/13/2012 1:07 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/13/2012 04:55 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: >> On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: >>> >>> Note that I have used VC 6.0 + Server 2003R2 PSDK and >>> build directly from .dsw/.dsp files. >>> Also I used pcre sources from old httpd (the cmake build just sucks >>> and I cannot make that working on windoze). >>> >> >> These are VC9 builds here w/ latest PCRE since VC6 is as good as >> dead. There's even been mention to do away with the .dsw/.dsp files >> which I am strongly against for reason other than supporting VC6. >> This just may have something to do with the newer msvcrt. >> > > We should drop all those .dsp/.sln/.vcproj files and have plain nmake > build system. > I have nmakefiles for apr/apu/iconv/httpd etc. > Offered that of httpd project couple of years back and it was said: > Who will maintain this?. We should use scons, bla, bla ... > > Well, the question is who maintains the current unusable build > environment? > Currently maintenance is editing ".dsp" files manually, and please if > someone can > explain to me how is that simpler the editing makefiles? > Not to mention that Makefile.win which does who know what. > > > Regards Mladen, see http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201201.mbox/%3C4F19C95C.8030608@gknw.net%3E Regards