httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
Date Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:23:20 GMT
Known: my apr does not have ldap configured into it.

attached: the stderr and verbose output to tty,
new build/aix files

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Feb 13, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> > On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
> >>
> >>      http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >>
> >> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
> >> NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
> >> easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
> >> of the official release.
> >>
> >>   [ ] +1: Good to go
> >>   [ ] +0: meh
> >>   [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
> >>
> >> Vote will last the normal 72 hrs.
> >
> > Out of tree build with "included" apr is broken.
> >
> > The new configure check
> >
> > if test "x$with_included_apr" = "xyes"; then
> >  apr_found=reconfig
> >  if test ! -d srclib/apr; then
> >    as_fn_error $? "Bundled APR requested but not found at ./srclib/.
> Download and unpack the corresponding apr and apr-util packages to
> ./srclib/." "$LINENO" 5
> >  fi
> > else
> >
> > only works, if there is a srclib/apr underneath the build directory. For
> out of tree builds this is not true. I guess it should be
> "$srcdir/srclib/apr".
> >
> > Is this critical? It is not a problem if building in tree or using an
> external APR.
>
> Since we no longer include apr, I don't think it's critical...

Mime
View raw message