Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30DB6B7B5 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15473 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 13:05:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 15415 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 13:05:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 15407 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2012 13:05:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:05:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of covener@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.173] (HELO mail-iy0-f173.google.com) (209.85.210.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:05:26 +0000 Received: by iagj37 with SMTP id j37so40444014iag.18 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:05:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uISf1pgk1W2rEiMrYV+URE2hdKdHJI7FIyt9YrNkA1I=; b=gJ87/09KTb6uEDIOgMydVvosRVgIiVs/OHEd5deakhGSqM3whUy7ajPwBDOfzh43EF fzekP/fwnDIPNtb4jwNlIe/GdB6P4UpDl5Hyt2hcJUhI+zPblN0iPOdH+yTBNzPDJ4ez bVf/EjFN2xgNK2NNJ188cEyoLDpHuQ0vtRxT0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.54.10 with SMTP id vs10mr10737771icb.13.1325682305535; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:05:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.178.10 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 05:05:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:05:05 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: default user/group -- daemon/daemon versus something else (AIX uses nobody/nobody traditionally) From: Eric Covener To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Or, is the project REALLY REALLY excited about the default user id always > being daemon/daemon? If so, I could just script that as a requirement for > installation. But before I choose either solution path (deviate from project > default, or historical-default for IBM packaging) I would appreciate some > feedback. > There's a comment in the default httpd.conf, I think any dedicated unprivileged user or nobody is probably fine.