Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C1AD9ECB for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97238 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2012 18:30:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97089 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2012 18:30:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97075 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2012 18:30:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:30:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.4] (HELO m1plsmtpa01-03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:30:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.67] ([75.38.194.115]) by m1plsmtpa01-03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with id T6Vw1i0052VrDDn016VwWB; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:29:57 -0700 Message-ID: <4F243EA4.5060007@rowe-clan.net> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:29:56 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.22 release References: <4F20894F.70800@rowe-clan.net> <4F208A9F.1060205@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <4F208A9F.1060205@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/25/2012 5:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. asked: >> >> [ ] Include apr-util 1.4.1 in any httpd 2.2.x >> [ ] Remain at apr-util 1.3.12 in any httpd 2.2.x So far, the tally remains 1.4.1 - jim, wrowe 1.3.12 - [none] Anyone else? Or do people believe this sort of change isn't worth some discussion/vote? Lazy consensus/silence can lead to an assortment of assumptions.