Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B4AEBC8D for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28927 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2012 18:06:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28614 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2012 18:05:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28606 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2012 18:05:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:05:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.242.35.75] (HELO dns-factory.at) (194.242.35.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:05:53 +0000 Received: from [172.17.100.7] apache@gknw.net [88.152.170.69] by dns-factory.at with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 8582 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:05:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4F09DAB5.90606@apache.org> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:04:37 +0100 From: Guenter Knauf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.25) Gecko/20111213 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.17 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Style violations References: <4F061C80.5040005@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 08.01.2012 17:20, schrieb Jim Jagielski: > How much is "entirely"? > > Do the>80char lines in ap_listen.h, ap_mmn.h, ap_mpm.h, ap_provider.h, > ap_regex.h, ap_regkey.h, ap_slotmem.h, http_core.h, http_protocol,h, > etc etc etc etc also constitute a rating of "entirely"? > > I'd look for more, but my time is better spent fixing things that > I find need-to-be-fixed rather than just pointing them out... :-) on the other side: I've asked me already often if we shouldnt increase=20 the maxchar/line; I believe that would in many cases greatly increase=20 readability ... and honestly: who the heck does nowadays work on a 80-line terminal?? isnt that a relic inherited from stone-time? I would be fine with f.e.=20 110 or 120 chars/line. G=FCn.