Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E78FF9F7E for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43504 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2012 07:36:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 43146 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2012 07:36:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 42797 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2012 07:36:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:36:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [188.40.99.202] (HELO eru.sfritsch.de) (188.40.99.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:36:18 +0000 Received: from [10.1.1.6] (helo=k.localnet) by eru.sfritsch.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs8Fx-0008Uu-MF for dev@httpd.apache.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:35:57 +0100 From: Stefan Fritsch To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Rename apachectl prior to 2.4.1 tag? Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:35:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201201302212.22336.sf@sfritsch.de> <4F271159.7060003@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <4F271159.7060003@rowe-clan.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201310835.56845.sf@sfritsch.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Monday 30 January 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > And there is apachectl, not httpdctl. > > Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 > releases? FTR, I am also -0 to this change right now.