Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74728B3C6 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87387 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2012 22:59:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87186 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2012 22:59:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87177 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2012 22:59:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:59:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [188.40.99.202] (HELO eru.sfritsch.de) (188.40.99.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:59:37 +0000 Received: from [10.1.1.6] (helo=k.localnet) by eru.sfritsch.de with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rp6NX-0001uP-Iv for dev@httpd.apache.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:59:15 +0100 From: Stefan Fritsch To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Include strangeness Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:59:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201201221914.29589.sf@sfritsch.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201222359.15421.sf@sfritsch.de> On Sunday 22 January 2012, Eric Covener wrote: > > even though the whole Include statement does match one file. I > > think this makes directory wildcards a lot less useful with > > Include. Is this intentional or an implementation quirk? Of > > course, one can always use IncludeOptional... > > See this relevant thread: > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/382531?do=post_vie > w_threaded#382531 Looking at that thread I guess I should not have opened that can of worms again. Let's just fix the docs to match the code.