httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jagunet.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1234336 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: include/ap_release.h server/util_expr_parse.c server/util_expr_parse.h
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:53:38 GMT
/sigh... Bill, you missed the whole point about bugs@ vs dev@.
Whatever.

I am quite happy to see Joe and Stefan working the issue
on the 'Re: trunk/2.4 core output filter is broken' thread
and, as usual, working and 'determining the best API solution'
with actual code and implementations... and doing so on
the dev@ list where it belongs.

On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:

> On 1/25/2012 2:28 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Bill, you should know by now that development is done on dev@...
>> private@ is "on-list" as well, by your definition.
> 
> Jim,
> 
> You asked for bugs.  We gave you bugs.  We tracked notes on bugs.  /sigh
> 
>> The issue is that 2.4.x is being held up by an issue, which
>> is being "discussed" not on dev@, and since it's not a security
>> issue, that's not the way we work.
> 
> It was your thread, dude; asked and answered.  /sigh
> 
> That bug revealed a more sinister bug, with discussion on dev.  /sigh
> <Attached Message.eml><Attached Message.eml>


Mime
View raw message