httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Fritsch ...@sfritsch.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.0
Date Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:07:43 GMT
On Tuesday 17 January 2012, Graham Leggett wrote:
> # verifying that logged content is 256 characters
> ok 51
> # posted content (length 1024) to bogus-perl.pl
> # got return code of: 500, expecting: 500
> ok 52
> # verifying log did not increase in size...
> ok 53
> # verifying log is greater than 8192 bytes.
> ok 54
> # verifying log did not grow after making bogus request.
> ok 55
> # verifying log did not grow after making another bogus request.
> ok 56
> # checking that HEAD /modules/cgi/perl.pl returns 200.
> ok 57
> Failed 1/58 subtests
> 
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> t/modules/cgi.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 57 Failed: 0)
>   Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 58 tests but ran 57.
> Files=1, Tests=57, 22 wallclock secs ( 0.27 usr  0.22 sys +  3.06
> cusr  5.35 csys =  8.90 CPU) Result: FAIL
> Failed 1/1 test programs. 0/57 subtests failed.
> 
> Regards,
> Graham
> --

The diff to a PASS run starts with:

 # posted content (length 1024) to bogus-perl.pl
 # got return code of: 500, expecting: 500
 ok 52
-# checking that log size (5115) is greater than 4516
+# verifying log did not increase in size...
 ok 53
-# verifying that logged content is 256 characters
-ok 54
 # verifying log is greater than 8192 bytes.
-ok 55
+ok 54

It's certainly a bug in the test that the number of "ok"s differs in 
different code paths. Can you try if the attached diff gives better 
debug output with -v?


Mime
View raw message