Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4ED52425.9060203@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:27:49 -0600
From: "William A. Rowe Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1207721 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./
 build/rpm/httpd.spec.in
References: <8f913395-0c19-4ff5-9bc4-cad7e516b55f@iris>
 <7236609C-59F1-407D-90C8-5C88D54C4689@sharp.fm>
 <4ED5232C.8010702@rowe-clan.net>
In-Reply-To: <4ED5232C.8010702@rowe-clan.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 11/29/2011 12:23 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 6:12 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>> On 29 Nov 2011, at 11:55, Igor Galić wrote:
>>
>>> And, our all time favourite: LDAP.
>>
>> This definitely needs separating out until it's abstraction is fixed.
>
> Not possible due to your veto; non-optional ldap dependency of apr-util,
> upon which httpd depends.

Ah, right... possible but convoluted...

  httpd-ldap  ->  apr-ldap-1
      |              |
      V              V
    httpd     ->  apr_util-1  ->  apr

Should really just veto such a nonsense change, since httpd had an actual
solution in hand, before it was obstructed.