Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFCE59207 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49669 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2011 22:01:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 49603 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2011 22:01:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 49595 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2011 22:01:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:01:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.229.52.226] (HELO baldur) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:01:33 +0000 Received: from baldur (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baldur (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9D1C109B02 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:01:11 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:01:07 +0000 From: Nick Kew To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Small things to do Message-ID: <20111108220107.306dadf5@baldur> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:10:06 +0100 (CET) Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Hi, > > > yesterday at the Dover Arms pub, we discussed what needs to be done for > 2.4 and we came up with a list of things that would be nice, but are > definitely not blockers for GA: mod_proxy_html: I want to switch to using ap_expr for conditional evaluation. I'd've done it long ago if it wasn't for the issue of 2.0/2.2 compatibility. In trunk that's not an issue. I'll tackle it within the next 48 hours. > - fix the bug in mod_authn_socache that I brought up on the list recently > (I will do that unless Nick beats me to it) Heh. Looking back, I said I'd do that when I was back home. I've now been back home for some time with no excuse beyond a mild bout of seasonal lurgy. -- Nick Kew