httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: prefetch proxy
Date Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:27:10 GMT

On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Nov 3, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> 
>>> Maybe I misunderstood, but I thought RĂ¼diger's original point was on
>>> track: EAGAIN here is a bug to fix somewhere since EAGAIN from
>>> blocking read is should-not-occur, and this code doesn't need to grow
>>> another error path.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From some research, it looks like EAGAIN is possible in
>> inet_csk_wait_for_connect()
> 
> that's the accept() flow, right?
> 
>> as well as there being other
>> people reporting similar "can't occur but does" with
>> EAGAIN and reads... It looks like, at least according to
>> recv() that EAGAIN is what we would get if a timeout
>> occurs.
> 
> why not APR_ETIMEUP?
> 

because that's not what is returned :)


Mime
View raw message