Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F11707C0F for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 06:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42956 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2011 06:55:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 42892 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2011 06:55:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 42884 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2011 06:55:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 06:55:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jfclere@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 06:55:37 +0000 Received: by wwf27 with SMTP id 27so2374832wwf.12 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:55:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bVs99WfMI3VPx5hzrHvpomhGgTDjePpbIV4uqYPQij8=; b=rK1gwN18wQEckvGGMkU/F5ANRCc7Q+1JeZBMVSGHY6TEL2fknXWqY9t7d0E0hqfIg3 2nFSo3lgTEsYvnPzQPw4oW+MZAWQMDgdGaNJUwXMEoWA6bn/7Ka04GgxnaOee+fpLHdw 6H11CPRT8F31wQRYQ6efCBk6nZb1dXxa8VpgE= Received: by 10.227.12.15 with SMTP id v15mr2470722wbv.77.1318575316149; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.34] (132.Red-79-148-52.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [79.148.52.132]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm12394788wbo.17.2011.10.13.23.55.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:55:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E97DCD1.8000505@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:55:13 +0200 From: jean-frederic clere User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_proxy_html References: <20111010230258.4f6dd275@baldur> <4E96A734.7030102@kippdata.de> In-Reply-To: <4E96A734.7030102@kippdata.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/13/2011 10:54 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 12.10.2011 23:56, Nick Kew wrote: >> >> On 10 Oct 2011, at 23:02, Nick Kew wrote: >> >>> Any interest? >> >> Looks like a lazy consensus in favour! > > If you ant it a bit less lazy: +1 from me also. > >> Regarding IP, it's mine to sign over, so that's straightforward. >> So I guess it's just a matter of going through the administrivia: >> - create the subproject in svn >> - relicense >> - produce documentation in our format >> - write a README >> - what have I missed that needs to happen up-front? >> >> I'm laptop-bound now and for another week, so the hurdle to action >> is higher than it would normally be. So I'll leave that time for any >> objections before attempting to do anything. In practice that means >> target date for action is the weekend of Oct 22/23. > > I had the impression Jim was +1 for bundling in 2.4, and you are > planning it as a separate module like mod_ftp or mod_fcgid. I think I prefer it in 2.4 than in a separate module. Cheers Jean-Frederic