httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Oliver <acoli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: mod_proxy_html
Date Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:12:15 GMT
nonbinding +1 for it being bundled.  That makes life a tad easier in
various environments where I have to configure mod_proxy...

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de> wrote:
> On 12.10.2011 23:56, Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>> On 10 Oct 2011, at 23:02, Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>>> Any interest?
>>
>> Looks like a lazy consensus in favour!
>
> If you ant it a bit less lazy: +1 from me also.
>
>> Regarding IP, it's mine to sign over, so that's straightforward.
>> So I guess it's just a matter of going through the administrivia:
>>  - create the subproject in svn
>>  - relicense
>>  - produce documentation in our format
>>  - write a README
>>  - what have I missed that needs to happen up-front?
>>
>> I'm laptop-bound now and for another week, so the hurdle to action
>> is higher than it would normally be.  So I'll leave that time for any
>> objections before attempting to do anything.  In practice that means
>> target date for action is the weekend of Oct 22/23.
>
> I had the impression Jim was +1 for bundling in 2.4, and you are
> planning it as a separate module like mod_ftp or mod_fcgid.
>
> I'm neutral on whether to bundle or not. We would need to handle the
> dependecies like for some other module when bundling, i.e. disabling the
> build if the deps are not found.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>
>

Mime
View raw message