Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ACD17EBC for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72150 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2011 10:07:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 72076 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2011 10:07:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 72046 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2011 10:07:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:07:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wjwilson@us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.159 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.110.159] (HELO e38.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:07:09 +0000 Received: from d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.226]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p889wltT022277 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 03:58:47 -0600 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p88A6i10196220 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:06:44 -0600 Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p88A6iTR030695 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:06:44 -0600 Received: from d03nm117.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm117.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.143]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p88A6hth030688 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:06:44 -0600 Subject: CVE-2011-3192 in 2.0 X-KeepSent: 03CDBB71:C9F3E439-87257905:00374616; type=4; name=$KeepSent To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.2 August 10, 2010 Message-ID: From: Wes Wilson Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 06:06:43 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM117/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP2|March 17, 2010) at 09/08/2011 04:06:43 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=08BBF396DFA4C0868f9e8a93df938690918c08BBF396DFA4C086" Content-Disposition: inline --0__=08BBF396DFA4C0868f9e8a93df938690918c08BBF396DFA4C086 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Are there plans to patch 2.0 with CVE-2011-3192? If so, would there be a patch or a new release 2.0.65? Is there a release schedule? Thanks, Wes Wilson --0__=08BBF396DFA4C0868f9e8a93df938690918c08BBF396DFA4C086 Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline

Are there plans to patch 2.0 with CVE-2011-3192?

If so, would there be a patch or a new release 2.0.65?

Is there a release schedule?


Thanks,
Wes Wilson --0__=08BBF396DFA4C0868f9e8a93df938690918c08BBF396DFA4C086--