Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 808BA7E8E for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64392 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2011 12:55:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 64305 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2011 12:55:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 64297 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2011 12:55:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:55:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 76.96.30.56 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jim@jagunet.com) Received: from [76.96.30.56] (HELO qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:55:49 +0000 Received: from omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.71]) by qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZQuh1h0041Y3wxoA6QvPDi; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:55:23 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.84.64]) by omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZQxo1h00F1PGofZ8bQxpZP; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:57:50 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Subject: Re: Pushing for httpd 2.4.0 GA From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:55:27 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <6506509B-B530-440D-BC13-1FFE66C7234B@jaguNET.com> To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) I agree that it shouldn't be a blocker=85 I agree it would Be Nice if it was bundled=85 Let me look at fcgid and see what the current status is. On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski = wrote: >> I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)=85 >>=20 >> The only 2 showstoppers I see as "reasonable" are the >> documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one. I plan on adding >> doccos for the ones that are currently lacking, but the >> question is what to do about mod_fcgid=85 What's the best >> way to accomplish folding mod_fcgid into 2.4? Should we copy >> trunk of mod_fcgid and put it into trunk of 2.4? Use some svn >> mojo? etc=85? >=20 > The bundling of fcgid shouldn't be a blocker IMO. Much to my > disappointment I haven't had time to work on it lately, and I see that > no one else has either. There's little time remaining in 2.4 > development and no apparent tuits to make effective use of the > bundling by moving towards a more 2.4-centric/exploitive > implementation, and at the same time bundling means one more test > scenario for getting fixes out to users of fcgid with 2.2.x. >=20 > For users, bundling saves one download and one tar/unzip. It builds > within the httpd tree currently if desired. >=20