httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>
Subject RE: Appropriate patches for 2.2.19 and 2.0.64?
Date Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:41:49 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net] 
> Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2011 03:51
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Appropriate patches for 2.2.19 and 2.0.64?
> 
> On 8/31/2011 4:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> > I've attempted to simply substitute the 2.2.19 filter code into the
> > 2.0.64 http_protocol.c sources, and am unsure how far off 
> these patches
> > are from what they need to be; there's been a significant 
> amount of drift
> > and refactoring in the interim.
> 
> Still looking for feedback, but the attached applies and 
> corresponds to
> 2.2.20 with the exception of atoi rather than strtoi 
> semantics, and without
> the no DefaultType exception..
> 
> 
> 

Thanks for taking care. It applies cleanly, but most byterange tests
from the framework fail:

Failed Test           Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/apache/byterange.t               136   97  71.32%  2-9 11 16-17 19-20 25-26
                                                     28 33-35 37-39 42 44-47
                                                     49-61 63-68 70-73 77-79
                                                     83-88 90-96 98-99 101-103
                                                     105-113 115-123 126-127
                                                     130 132-136
t/apache/byterange5.t                5    4  80.00%  1 3-5
t/apache/byterange7.t               13    5  38.46%  2-5 12

This might be because I use a 64 bit build of 2.0.x (no other test environment at hand
at the moment) and 2.0.x is not really good at 64 bit (lots of compiler warnings).


Regards

Rüdiger

Mime
View raw message