httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1176254 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Date Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:21:02 GMT
Fixed… Thx!

On Sep 27, 2011, at 3:52 AM, rpluem@apache.org wrote:

> Author: rpluem
> Date: Tue Sep 27 07:52:54 2011
> New Revision: 1176254
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176254&view=rev
> Log:
> * Add comment
> 
> Modified:
>    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1176254&r1=1176253&r2=1176254&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Tue Sep 27 07:52:54 2011
> @@ -159,6 +159,15 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>     Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1175980
>     2.2.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/byterange0-.txt
>     +1: jim
> +    rpluem asks: Shouldn't it be 
> +
> +     if (sum_lengths > clength) {
> +
> +     instead of
> +
> +     if (sum_lengths = clength) {
> +
> +     like in trunk as otherwise we still send a 200 for 0-?
> 
> PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message