httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Appropriate patches for 2.2.19 and 2.0.64?
Date Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:18:42 GMT
On 9/1/2011 2:41 AM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote:
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net] 
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2011 03:51
>> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Appropriate patches for 2.2.19 and 2.0.64?
>>
>> On 8/31/2011 4:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>> I've attempted to simply substitute the 2.2.19 filter code into the
>>> 2.0.64 http_protocol.c sources, and am unsure how far off 
>> these patches
>>> are from what they need to be; there's been a significant 
>> amount of drift
>>> and refactoring in the interim.
>>
>> Still looking for feedback, but the attached applies and 
>> corresponds to
>> 2.2.20 with the exception of atoi rather than strtoi 
>> semantics, and without
>> the no DefaultType exception..
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Thanks for taking care. It applies cleanly, but most byterange tests
> from the framework fail:
> 
> Failed Test           Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> t/apache/byterange.t               136   97  71.32%  2-9 11 16-17 19-20 25-26
>                                                      28 33-35 37-39 42 44-47
>                                                      49-61 63-68 70-73 77-79
>                                                      83-88 90-96 98-99 101-103
>                                                      105-113 115-123 126-127
>                                                      130 132-136
> t/apache/byterange5.t                5    4  80.00%  1 3-5
> t/apache/byterange7.t               13    5  38.46%  2-5 12
> 
> This might be because I use a 64 bit build of 2.0.x (no other test environment at hand
> at the moment) and 2.0.x is not really good at 64 bit (lots of compiler warnings).

Ideally can you provide me the -verbose output (offlist or to your
people.a.o/ space if it's lengthy)?



Mime
View raw message