httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Keith Mashinter <kmash...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Pushing for httpd 2.4.0 GA
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:42:47 GMT
Just a reminder about this, providing a way to phase out a server by only accepting existing
sessions/routed requests. 
 
|51247|New|Enh|2011-05-23|Enhance mod_proxy and _balancer with worker status
 
I've reviewed the other patch https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841 and
I had a similar idea, wondering if the route-only intent would happen if I tried to set lbfactor=0
but it only allowed values 1-100 and I worried about the complexity of changing the lbmethod
formulae so using a separate status code seemed cleaner.  It's a bit of a magic value, but
an intuitive one I think.  On the user surface lbfactor=0 requires less change than my ROUTE_ONLY
to the configuration and balancer-manager but it needs some documentation to clarify the intent.
 
I also attached a patch to https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51247 for the
trunk, but since I'm having trouble with the overall compile it's "in theory".  Please forgive
compile issues, but I wanted to at least share the thought and will update when I can verify
a compile and test run.

In the end, either solution can work, and my hope is that multiple attempts at the same goal
make a stronger case to bring the functionality to the 2.2.x stream for people to enjoy sooner
rather than later.

\|/- Keith Mashinter 
kmashint@yahoo.com

From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 9:00:44 AM
Subject: Re: Pushing for httpd 2.4.0 GA


On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:

> 
>>        - mpm_simple
> 
> mpm_simple likely to get dropped for 2.4, see our main STATUS file
> 

I hope to spent some time diving into mod_simple… I have some
uncommitted patches that I need to re-look at.
Mime
View raw message