Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4E5D20F3.2090809@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:42:11 -0500
From: "William A. Rowe Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.20 tarballs
References: 
 <E563FB5AB3F02844AC749BA39E494AB4040CA35F@VF-MBX11.internal.vodafone.com>
 <73CCF316-B818-4904-AC80-BB3B24607BF1@jaguNET.com>
 <A19DACA0-EF49-402F-8B2E-D6412ED7E6C7@jaguNET.com>
 <4E5D1454.30704@rowe-clan.net>
 <CAHSOX_A=KG2q_roD=Lq5Ecd49hDaQ8W5z51Pj60H4fcwUFWiuw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHSOX_A=KG2q_roD=Lq5Ecd49hDaQ8W5z51Pj60H4fcwUFWiuw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 8/30/2011 12:34 PM, Greg Ames wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:48 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net
> <mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net>> wrote:
> 
>     On 8/30/2011 10:18 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>     > If we get enough votes by, say, 1:30pm Eastern time (2hrs), I'll retag
>     > and reroll… Otherwise, I'll go ahead w/ releasing 2.2.20.
>     >
>     > PS: Power and net are bouncing like jumping beans so I'll check
>     >     when I can :)
> 
>     It seems this could actually break resume requests for .iso images,
>     for example, so it seems prudent to reroll.
> 
> 
> can you elaborate on how this could cause breakage please?  we have to retest if we reroll.

Nevermind, the commit is a noop, any bug still exists, we should just continue
with this package.  If the brigade must be split at 5Gb, it will fail with or
without this patch.