Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jorton@redhat.com designates
 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender)
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:07:55 +0100
From: Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_ssl in trunk with OpenSSL 0.9.7 as a minimum requirement?
Message-ID: <20110804080754.GA8331@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
KIn-Reply-To: <4E3975F6.6060309@velox.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
Organization: Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No.
 03798903
  Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Mark Hegarty (Ireland),
 Matt Parson (USA), Charlie Peters (USA)

Hi Kaspar,

On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 06:23:18PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
> Ok, so the initial version of that patch became relatively large:
> 
>   https://people.apache.org/~kbrand/mod_ssl-toolkit-support.v1.diff

Thanks so much for taking this on!

> Even though trunk is CTR, I'm somewhat reluctant with simply going ahead
> and would appreciate if people could comment on this approach (e.g. if
> it's fine or splitting up would be preferred, etc.).

I agree with Bill, splitting up would be nice; otherwise looks very 
good.  It will be great to see the back of ssl_toolkit_compat.h :)

I fixed the perl foo in ssl_engine_dh.c so that it creates the right 
code after regeneration, it looks like that was broken.

Regards, Joe