httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.20 tarballs
Date Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:54:44 GMT
Could I get at least 1 more binding vote…??

On Aug 30, 2011, at 1:42 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:

> On 8/30/2011 12:34 PM, Greg Ames wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:48 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net
>> <mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net>> wrote:
>> 
>>    On 8/30/2011 10:18 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> If we get enough votes by, say, 1:30pm Eastern time (2hrs), I'll retag
>>> and reroll… Otherwise, I'll go ahead w/ releasing 2.2.20.
>>> 
>>> PS: Power and net are bouncing like jumping beans so I'll check
>>>    when I can :)
>> 
>>    It seems this could actually break resume requests for .iso images,
>>    for example, so it seems prudent to reroll.
>> 
>> 
>> can you elaborate on how this could cause breakage please?  we have to retest if
we reroll.
> 
> Nevermind, the commit is a noop, any bug still exists, we should just continue
> with this package.  If the brigade must be split at 5Gb, it will fail with or
> without this patch.
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message