httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 2.2 approach for byterange?
Date Sun, 28 Aug 2011 17:58:06 GMT


On 08/28/2011 11:12 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Saturday 27 August 2011, Eric Covener wrote:
>> lots of threads.  Trying to resynch here, not a vote.
>>
>> For 2.2:
>>
>> [  ] everything in 2.3 (brigade_copy, mergeing, validation, ???)
> 
> We don't know how many clients are broken by merging.
> 
>> [X ] just the cheap brigade copy + sum_len > clen failsafe
> 
> I think this should be sufficient.

I agree, but maybe we should pass the brigade down the chain after
each range or at least after a specific number of ranges to avoid
piling up too much buckets in the byte range filter.

> 
>> [  ] above + default/configurable limit on num ranges

My second preference if the first is not seen as been enough.

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Mime
View raw message