httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Fritsch ...@sfritsch.de>
Subject Re: 2.2 approach for byterange?
Date Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:12:07 GMT
On Saturday 27 August 2011, Eric Covener wrote:
> lots of threads.  Trying to resynch here, not a vote.
> 
> For 2.2:
> 
> [  ] everything in 2.3 (brigade_copy, mergeing, validation, ???)

We don't know how many clients are broken by merging.

> [X ] just the cheap brigade copy + sum_len > clen failsafe

I think this should be sufficient.

> [  ] above + default/configurable limit on num ranges

> [  ] just a default/configurable limit on numranges

Without the cheap brigade_copy, the limit would either have to be very 
low or one would have to make it dependent on the ordering of the 
ranges. The latter would mean unnecessary complexity.


Mime
View raw message