httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] mod_ldap
Date Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:14:58 GMT
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:55 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Only presently available options are available as choices to end this
> now unproductive discussion [any heretofore unseen complete abstration
> of ldap cannot be considered with no patches offered].  This vote is
> limited to the scope of the httpd project and expresses a preference,
> there is no technical basis demonstrated to carry a veto.
>
>  [ ]  Retain ap_ldap API's in httpd 2.3 mod_ldap, as currently in trunk
>      (binding mod_ldap to ldap libs)

yes, unless I misunderstood option #3

>
>  [ ]  Move ap_ldap API's to the core
>      (binding both httpd and mod_ldap to ldap libs)

no


>  [ ]  Move ap_ldap API's to yet another mod_ldaps[1] module
>      (binding both mod_ldap and mod_ldaps to ldap libs)

IIUC, the only benefit (and a great one) to yet another ldap shared
library (whether mod_foo or in apr) is if there is a complete
abstraction, such that only one shared library binds to libldap* and
that one shared library can be switched out to switch client libraries
and libldap* symbol use doesn't leak between different functional
areas.

Is there some other possibility?

>
>  [ ]  Revert to using apr_ldap (restricting mod_ldap to apr-util 1.x [2])
>      (binding both apr and mod_ldap to ldap libs)

no

>  [ ]  Remove mod_authnz_ldap / mod_ldap from httpd 2.3

no

>
>
> [1] other name suggestions are welcome
> [2] vote thread removing ldap from apr-2.x;
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201004.mbox/%3C4BD46614.6010503@rowe-clan.net%3E
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201005.mbox/%3CAANLkTinKzmDYbxo2VggZLOxPY72mH0OReK-kUeSGJSa3@mail.gmail.com%3E
>



-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Mime
View raw message