Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DAD34B8D for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84141 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:13:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 84071 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 23:13:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 84063 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 23:13:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:13:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paul@querna.org designates 209.85.216.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.173] (HELO mail-qy0-f173.google.com) (209.85.216.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:13:07 +0000 Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so3232678qyk.18 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:12:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.102.86 with SMTP id f22mr227021qco.28.1308179566194; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.62.201 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:12:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:12:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 3.0, the 2011 thread. From: Paul Querna To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Akins, Brian wrot= e: > On 6/15/11 6:01 PM, "Paul Querna" wrote: > >> pocore: For base OS portability and memory pooling system. >>=C2=A0=C2=A0 > > How does this compare to APR? It's like an APR version 3.0. It has a faster pools system, with the ability to free() items, and it drops all of the apr-utilism things like databases, ldap, etc.