Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5582B4969 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10824 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:05:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 10669 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:05:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 10661 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 12:05:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:05:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of horowity@checkpoint.com designates 194.29.34.68 as permitted sender) Received: from [194.29.34.68] (HELO michael.checkpoint.com) (194.29.34.68) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:04:53 +0000 Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.26]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4JC4UIV018966 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 15:04:30 +0300 X-CheckPoint: {4DD51435-0-1B221DC2-FFFF} Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Thu, 19 May 2011 15:04:29 +0300 From: Yehezkel Horowitz To: "dev@httpd.apache.org" Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:02:46 +0300 Subject: RE: ap_regexec API for buffers (not NULL terminated strings) Thread-Topic: ap_regexec API for buffers (not NULL terminated strings) Thread-Index: AcwWGKs93O6L+u2EQOynFhbIWkaboQAA8sZQ Message-ID: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80226F44C649C@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> References: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80226F44C6472@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80226F44C6487@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com> <0146A030-BC57-41C0-B0B3-8914893777BD@sharp.fm> In-Reply-To: <0146A030-BC57-41C0-B0B3-8914893777BD@sharp.fm> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80226F44C649Cilex01adche_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80226F44C649Cilex01adche_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Graham I have opened record #51231 in bugzilla (patch attached to the record). https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51231 Thanks Yehezkel ________________________________ From: Graham Leggett [mailto:minfrin@sharp.fm] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 2:33 PM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: ap_regexec API for buffers (not NULL terminated strings) On 19 May 2011, at 1:24 PM, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote: I have a patch (based on 2.2.17) to where should I submit it? Add it to bugzilla so it doesn't get lost, and then ping here, so someone c= an pick it up. Ideally, the patch should apply to httpd-trunk first, but having a v2.2 pat= ch also (assuming the trunk one doesn't apply as is) makes it easier to pro= pose for backport. Regards, Graham -- --_000_7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80226F44C649Cilex01adche_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Graham

I have opened record #51231 in bugzill= a (patch attached to the record).

https:/= /issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51231

Thanks

Yehezkel

From: Graham L= eggett [mailto:minfrin@sharp.fm]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011= 2:33 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: ap_regexec API = for buffers (not NULL terminated strings)

On 19 May 2011, at 1:24 PM, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:

I have a patch (based on 2.2.17) to wh= ere should I submit it?

Add it to bugzilla so it doesn't get lost, and then ping here, so someone can pick it up.

Ideally, the patch should apply to httpd-trunk first, but having a = v2.2 patch also (assuming the trunk one doesn't apply as is) makes it easier to propose for backport.

Regards,

Graham

--_000_7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80226F44C649Cilex01adche_--