From dev-return-71440-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Mon May 2 22:37:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BF993855 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 22:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24085 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:37:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 24028 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 22:37:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 24020 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 22:37:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:37:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of DRuggeri@primary.net designates 216.87.38.215 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.87.38.215] (HELO mail9.primary.net) (216.87.38.215) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 22:37:41 +0000 Received: from home.simonrage.com ([216.114.77.126]:32794 helo=[192.168.0.2]) by mail9.primary.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QH1jx-0003VX-RY for dev@httpd.apache.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 17:37:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4DBF3218.7070703@primary.net> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 17:37:12 -0500 From: Daniel Ruggeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_proxy & headers References: <4DBE8DCA.7090802@gmail.com> <20110502121154.3fd17985@baldur> <4DBED381.1020209@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ACL-Warn: X-The email account used to send this email was: DRuggeri@primary.net X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail9.primary.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 5/2/2011 11:19 AM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote: > How about the output of mod_info. Doesn't it provide what you need? > > Regards > > Rüdiger I have long wondered about exactly this information. My only rub is that it's not always feasible (and definitely not very intuitive) to use mod_info to gather this information by users. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] On 5/2/2011 11:19 AM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote: > How about the output of mod_info. Doesn't it provide what you need? > > Regards > > Rüdiger I have long wondered about exactly this information. My only rub is that it's not always feasible (and definitely not very intuitive) to use mod_info to gather this information by users. I think that, actually, the output of mod_info if tidied up would serve as a great starting point for this data in its own document... perhaps with some brief explanations of what each hook is and when it may come into play for users? I smell a small doc project... -- -- Daniel Ruggeri