httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Ruggeri <DRugg...@primary.net>
Subject Re: id=51247 Enhance mod_proxy and _balancer with worker status flag to only accept sticky session routes
Date Wed, 25 May 2011 00:27:23 GMT
On 5/24/2011 9:18 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I like the concept... will review.
>
> PS: Most patches should be against trunk. We fold into trunk,
>      test and only then propose for backport for 2.2.x
>
>
> On May 23, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Keith Mashinter wrote:
>
>> I've added a patch to the proxy/balancer to allow for route-only workers are only
enabled for sticky session routes, allowing for an even more graceful fade-out of a server
than making its lbfactor=1 compared to lbfactor=100 for others.
>>
>> Please reply/vote if you also think it's useful.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51247
>> This enhancement, actually SVN Patched against 2.2.19, provides a worker status
>> flag to set a proxy worker as only accepting requests with sticky session
>> routes, e.g. only accept requests with a .route such as Cookie
>> JSESSIONID=xxx.tc2.
>>  ...
>
>

I think there are two patches available to do the same thing - sorry for 
not following up on this sooner. I brought this up in conversation with 
Bill on this list back in October and haven't dug into it since.

I attached the patch to a bug opened by Cameron Stokes
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841

I agree that this functionality would be nice to have but am agnostic as 
to which method accomplishes this :) They both seem to take different 
routes to get to the same goal.

Jim, if you wouldn't mind reviewing both and suggesting one to be 
cleaned up for a patch generated against trunk. I'm happy to volunteer 
the effort to adjust my patch or at least take care of that bug that's 
out there still.

-- 
--
Daniel Ruggeri

Mime
View raw message