Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16884 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2011 14:12:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2011 14:12:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 56165 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 14:12:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 56103 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2011 14:12:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 56095 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2011 14:12:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:12:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of minfrin@sharp.fm designates 72.32.122.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.32.122.20] (HELO chandler.sharp.fm) (72.32.122.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:12:00 +0000 Received: from chandler.sharp.fm (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chandler.sharp.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A54450801A for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:11:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [10.0.0.251] (87-194-125-18.bethere.co.uk [87.194.125.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: minfrin@sharp.fm) by chandler.sharp.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92D1508001 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:11:39 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <6D4875B8-D6D5-41A0-ABF2-23A22DF04318@sharp.fm> From: Graham Leggett To: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: blocking Upgrade Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:11:38 +0200 References: <697525EE-57D4-475D-802A-E47752833665@gbiv.com> <64BDDE0E-0A50-443E-8EB1-04FF7EA41847@gbiv.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 30 Mar 2011, at 3:53 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > No, websockets is not designed to work with intermediaries. > There is no standard behavior beyond opening the connection, > so connections through proxies should use CONNECT. Does a websocket client have a way of knowing it should use CONNECT? Regards, Graham --