Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 76.96.59.227 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of jim@jagunet.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1087331 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: include/http_core.h
 include/http_main.h modules/generators/mod_status.c server/core.c
 server/main.c
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikfyDTMKqd0iAF3yBdZ631JZsdheump9tRdyoFz@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:59:50 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1CABA954-232D-4C7E-8B47-3F77C4A47BF0@jaguNET.com>
References: <20110331151209.CF5A923888D2@eris.apache.org>
 <AANLkTik1gs7inyoQY5AFTUTW4GBfMiNbL_Pj58QPtYDX@mail.gmail.com>
 <2B3A1B76-5827-4936-B750-79272CD2C55E@apache.org>
 <AANLkTikfyDTMKqd0iAF3yBdZ631JZsdheump9tRdyoFz@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org


On Mar 31, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mar 31, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> 
>>> there is one true generation, and it is the one you implement here,
>>> and shouldn't be managed by the MPM
>>> 
>> 
>> Well, I agree, of course, hence the implementation. But I was
>> hesitant to touch the mpm "perception" of generation, since
>> that's something that's been exposed for awhile...
> 
> It has already changed in 2.3.x in that you have to use ap_mpm_query()
> to find the generation.
> 
> I think main() just tells the MPM what the generation is and the MPM
> goes about its business with minimal code changes.
> ap_mpm_query(GENERATION) would still work if we choose, but we could
> back that out, preferring one-true-way over making 2.3.current modules
> happy.
> 
> I'm happy to try this out in a few days.
> 

I haven't looked, but yeah, it might not be as all-encompasing
as I think ;)