Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75944 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2011 13:59:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2011 13:59:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 62555 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 13:59:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62045 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2011 13:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61813 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2011 13:58:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:58:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zdavatz@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.173] (HELO mail-vx0-f173.google.com) (209.85.220.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:58:51 +0000 Received: by vxb40 with SMTP id 40so666042vxb.18 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 05:58:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PZl3l64qOc+rscw04T20sy/4/EW/4OT63n+URstUey0=; b=ddO39IKJV7lL8UdJ958s3wx3oh18vwX/t/vy0Xuw/lvgY0LF9PrTs0NmPxO/slHZND 2S1m8TW68d4Kg8Oy86XCJ2TuzfPZ5p+VvoD4U1EvYmav/7tIm0OsIJt1VtiI70KcHcbq BZUAMrokPUVwaGOJ3fSG14I1o/zOx+XzNszRk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PaRbO4cODXbHIGxO0COGJhS6wwzr5jKirT3ZVvzx08MLdQKDB3Ij6xJUSB7Y4PPp1f 1EWeol8W2M6hxYxWJ/4WuOrQBqkTPepKY5vk0V4Y4wV/n7nyV3FnTkfEu2GybIHpf5Oe jajFLGBjHwW9bFShZAfczA+OzUq7aC3HmE8ug= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.86.149 with SMTP id s21mr16000405qcl.23.1297346310221; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 05:58:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.226.3 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 05:58:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D53AE5F.7010803@apache.org> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:58:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Different vhosts.conf between Apache 2.2.17 for Windows and Apache for Linux 2.2.14-rc1 - issue 25435? From: Zeno Davatz To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dear Eric Thank you for your reply. On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> Now I do not yet understand if that has any meaning or not. > > It means your mod_ruby can't act as a handler, the piece =A0which > actually generates the response for a request. =A0This is why it only > seems to work when you configure your windows system to run ruby > scripts as CGI -- but it's not actually using mod_ruby at that point. So what you are trying to tell me is, that mod_ruby on my Windows Box does not yet act as a handler? Another important difference is that my Server-Info of mod_ruby.c of my Linux Server tells me Content handlers: yes and my Server-Info of my Windows Box tells me Content handlers: none Is there a specifically different way to handle Content Handlers on Windows? I am now looking at this: http://oreilly.com/catalog/wrapmod/chapter/ch04.html Thank you for any Feedback. Best Zeno