Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51683 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2011 00:23:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2011 00:23:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 62736 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2011 00:23:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62673 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2011 00:23:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62665 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2011 00:23:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:23:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of minfrin@sharp.fm designates 72.32.122.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.32.122.20] (HELO chandler.sharp.fm) (72.32.122.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:23:24 +0000 Received: from chandler.sharp.fm (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chandler.sharp.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C25D78057 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:23:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.0.251] (87-194-125-18.bethere.co.uk [87.194.125.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: minfrin@sharp.fm) by chandler.sharp.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E10A7804B for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:23:03 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <0529A2BB-2284-494B-B979-592BE4279E8C@sharp.fm> From: Graham Leggett To: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: svn commit: r1070179 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_cache.xml modules/cache/cache_storage.c modules/cache/cache_storage.h modules/cache/mod_cache.c modules/cache/mod_cache.h Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:23:01 +0200 References: <20110213020330.953172388900@eris.apache.org> <5E44EE80-76CD-4743-B57E-AF90FF0F97EC@gbiv.com> <823F6C2D-68BA-4358-937F-8B70BB186719@sharp.fm> <930AC3FB-B450-4038-B6D7-EBF4C2109F7B@sharp.fm> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP On 14 Feb 2011, at 2:15 AM, Paul Querna wrote: > It does a single request to the backend, but doesn't _invalidate_ the > existing cache, which would cause a flood of other, non-attacker > clients to come in. I think that would be the origin of Roy saying that we should only invalidate if the result is 2xx. Someone trying methods in the hope they would do something would get a 405 Method Not Supported. Regards, Graham --