httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1066944 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES configure.in server/main.c
Date Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:26:43 GMT

On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:

> On 2/4/2011 2:54 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1 here as well, if this is to be addressed at all, the portability
>>> layer seems like the correct place to do it, if desired by the
>>> app.
>> 
>> Would you prefer os/unix or APR? I am also happy to simply revert if 
>> that is the majority opinion.
> 
> I suspect that a generic apr '_refresh' function would be most useful
> across the board, others might disagree.
> 

Isn't APR for "portability"? All I see is a single function
call... 

If we have to pollute something with this res_init(), then httpd
is likely the better place than expanding APR even more beyond
being a "simple" portable runtime ;)

But I'm fine either way... as long as it builds and links ;)

Mime
View raw message