Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65613 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2011 12:28:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2011 12:28:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 42196 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2011 12:28:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 41804 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2011 12:28:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 41792 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2011 12:28:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:28:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of DRuggeri@primary.net designates 216.87.38.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.87.38.216] (HELO mail11.primary.net) (216.87.38.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:28:05 +0000 Received: from home.simonrage.com ([216.114.77.126]:33571 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail11.primary.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pe5EN-0001TZ-Lu for dev@httpd.apache.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 06:27:44 -0600 Message-ID: <4D3192BF.3050802@primary.net> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 06:27:43 -0600 From: Daniel Ruggeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: millisecond timeouts in mod_proxy & mod_proxy_http References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail11.primary.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 1/14/2011 7:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > It looks like it needs some fine-tuning and some formatting changes, > but assuming we have CLA approval, I'd say lets fold it in > and clean up post submission;) ... >> > - extends RewriteRules to implement a custom error document or return >> > status per rule if timeout occurs [...] Content analysis details: (-1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] On 1/14/2011 7:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > It looks like it needs some fine-tuning and some formatting changes, > but assuming we have CLA approval, I'd say lets fold it in > and clean up post submission;) ... >> > - extends RewriteRules to implement a custom error document or return >> > status per rule if timeout occurs FWIW, Jim, I'm a big fan of this part. -- Daniel Ruggeri