httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: 2.4 and APR_HAS_THREADS, etc
Date Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:27:00 GMT

On Jan 7, 2011, at 2:00 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:

> On 1/7/2011 10:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> There's a lot of cruft in 2.3/2.4 that, imo at least, doesn't
>> belong in a 2011-era codebase. For example, 2.3/2.4 should
>> *require* support for threads, and shared-memory and other
>> such stuff that we test for and work around.
> 
> Silly question, but before we debate such things, would you at least
> define 'other such stuff' individually?
> 
> Completely agreed on threads and shm, all binaries I build have used
> these for a decade with httpd since APR 0.9.   I think the 1980's OS's
> are now a historical footnote.
> 

For right now, APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY and APR_HAS_THREADS
should be dropped for 2.3/2.4. I'd be happy with that for
now ;)


Mime
View raw message