httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Issac Goldstand <mar...@beamartyr.net>
Subject Re: official httpd VC9 builds
Date Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:05:00 GMT
I believe also that wrowe mentioned to me that  we wanted to support
command line (make) builds, and VC9 doesn't allow us to export makefiles.

I'm +1 for making both VC6 and VC9 builds from 2.4 and on, like PHP does.

  Issac

On 31/01/2011 11:21, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> Hi
>
> If I remember correctly wrowe said it was because a lot of 3rd party
> modules use VC6.
> Although that was a while ago so I could be wrong.
>
> If I'm indeed correct maybe  2.4 is a good time to switch to VC9?
>
> ~Jorge
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm a php developer, and I'm using VC9 php builds on windows(PHP 5.3 doesn't
>> support ), hence I'm using the apache httpd builds from apachelounge.com,
>> because you guys only offer VC6 windows builds, and I'm too lazy to build
>> myself.
>> My question is: why is this the case? as far as I can tell, the project
>> builds fine with VC9, so why don't you support the VC9 builds?
>> I would prefer the official builds for VC9, if that would be an option.
>> If I missed something obvious there, then please bear with me, I tried to
>> find the answer in the windows section of the download page, the wiki, and
>> the mailing lists, but without much luck.
>>
>> Tyrael
>>


Mime
View raw message