httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <>
Subject Re: 2.4 and APR_HAS_THREADS, etc
Date Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:00:46 GMT
On 1/7/2011 10:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> There's a lot of cruft in 2.3/2.4 that, imo at least, doesn't
> belong in a 2011-era codebase. For example, 2.3/2.4 should
> *require* support for threads, and shared-memory and other
> such stuff that we test for and work around.

Silly question, but before we debate such things, would you at least
define 'other such stuff' individually?

Completely agreed on threads and shm, all binaries I build have used
these for a decade with httpd since APR 0.9.   I think the 1980's OS's
are now a historical footnote.

View raw message