httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release 2.3.10 tarballs as Alpha
Date Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:00:56 GMT

On Dec 21, 2010, at 12:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:

> On 12/21/2010 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> 
>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:16 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> 
>>> On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at:
>>>> 
>>>> 	http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>>> 
>>>> Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.10-alpha.
>>> 
>>> +1 to httpd-2.3.10-alpha.tar.gz/bz2
>>> (to the contents of httpd-2.3.10.tar.gz - but -1 to the current package name)
>> 
>> I've no idea how to grok this... do you want a rename of
>> the archive names *as well as the resulting untarred dir*
>> to be renamed or just the tar.* files?
> 
> EDONTCARE, it's the package name I'm concerned about.  So, let's refer to
> 2.3.4 and 2.3.5 which were named correctly... looking at archive.a.o/dist/httpd
> 
> drwxr-xr-x  0 chip   chip        0 Nov 25  2009 httpd-2.3.4-alpha/
> -rw-r--r--  0 chip   chip        0 Nov 25  2009 httpd-2.3.4-alpha/.deps
> -rw-r--r--  0 chip   chip     8781 May  8  2009 httpd-2.3.4-alpha/.gdbinit
> -rw-r--r--  0 chip   chip    14882 Feb 14  2008 httpd-2.3.4-alpha/ABOUT_APACHE
> ...

See that's the rub: to get the untarred dirs to have that
name, I need to reroll the whole thing. I'd prefer not
having to do so at this point.


As such, I'm guessing I can close the vote with at least
3 (binding) +1 votes.
Mime
View raw message