Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56797 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2010 19:54:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Nov 2010 19:54:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 48260 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2010 19:54:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 48213 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2010 19:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 48205 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2010 19:54:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 19:54:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rainer.jung@kippdata.de designates 195.227.30.149 as permitted sender) Received: from [195.227.30.149] (HELO mailserver.kippdata.de) (195.227.30.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 19:54:47 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.177] ([192.168.2.177]) by mailserver.kippdata.de (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id oA7JsOHa002070 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:54:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CD703F0.8020100@kippdata.de> Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:54:24 +0100 From: Rainer Jung User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: New key for jim@apache.org References: <7EE6B2C6-D72F-4E01-ABEB-B37E005B434D@jaguNET.com> In-Reply-To: <7EE6B2C6-D72F-4E01-ABEB-B37E005B434D@jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07.11.2010 20:36, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Resending w/ GPG sig. Need at least a few sigs before I can > T&R httpd 2.3.9-alpha! Done. Isn't it for the moment enough that you signed it with your already trusted key? Only when 1024 effectvely becomes breakable this wouldn't be valid any longer. Regards, Rainer