Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58536 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2010 10:42:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2010 10:42:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 96696 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 10:42:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 96373 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2010 10:42:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 96365 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2010 10:42:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:42:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.20.83.52] (HELO webthing) (209.20.83.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:42:14 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.101] (walkham.free-online.co.uk [80.229.52.226]) by webthing (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4515DC001 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:41:53 +0000 (UTC) References: <4CAE80B3.6090107@rowe-clan.net> <4CC08AA0.1020104@rowe-clan.net> <20101021225657.0fa2152b@baldur> <4CC0D347.7090703@rowe-clan.net> <20101022225713.645de9db@baldur> <4CC4BF81.6010606@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <4CC4BF81.6010606@rowe-clan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nick Kew Subject: Re: [vote] Release mod_ftp 1.0.0 as GA Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:41:52 +0100 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) On 25 Oct 2010, at 00:21, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> I'm finding it slower-than-anticipated progress, as I'm not >> getting useful messages in ftp_error_log (at LogLevel Debug). >> Not a showstopper to deployment, but a bit demotivating when >> I have no real use case for it. > > Completely understandable. > > I'm very interesting in your non-working config, I'm talking about trivialities. Example 1: I used the out-of-the-box config, and it refused my login. I might have spent a *long* time trying to figure out whether it was trying to authenticate me and if so why it failed, if I had been less familiar with the bland "client denied by server configuration", which was the only message (let alone clue) in the logs. Example 2: my first attempt to PUT failed. I expected it to fail due to file permissions, which I had intentionally left unset. I was looking for an error message that would tell me *what* filesystem access was attempted. Nothing! All with LogLevel Debug. -- Nick Kew