Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rainer.jung@kippdata.de
 designates 195.227.30.149 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4CB45563.8030802@kippdata.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:32:35 +0200
From: Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de;
 rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Planning some tags, and more tags
References: <4C9CE706.1060706@rowe-clan.net>	<4CAB6EDA.3080105@rowe-clan.net>
 <AANLkTinUpT8TXWkGSx_UvV_x6XzVw0gQUpmG7mSN1gfA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4CB3590B.8010108@rowe-clan.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CB3590B.8010108@rowe-clan.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11.10.2010 20:35, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> ... and tagged 0.9.  Note 0.9 -util tag already failed on Darwin and we are
> holding 2.0 tag for a bundled expat for -util fix.  There are four backport
> bullets in 2.0 STATUS with two signoffs already, if anyone has eyeballs to
> invest between now and when -util has been retagged.  I'd hope this is the
> final 2.0 tag, so if any attract your attention as 'really should fix', this
> would be the day.
>
> I presume the bundled expat flaw did not apply to 2.2.  Jeff was going to look
> at the last 2.2 patch per Joe's comments.  Not sure if his travels interfere
> with this, so if he's unable I'm game to apply this with the additional footnotes
> before tagging.

The build system is substantially different in 1.3.x. So neither is 
there the big difference in linker flags used for Darwin, AIX etc. and 
other *nix platforms, nor the different code path between implicit 
bundled and explicit builtin. In short: 1.3.10 looks good.

I also retested 1.3.10 using implicit bundled expat, which was fine on 
Solaris. Couldn't do testing on Darwin or AIX though.

Regards,

Rainer