httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Graham Leggett <>
Subject Re: caching partial repsonses
Date Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:13:06 GMT
On 03 Sep 2010, at 12:53 AM, Nick Kew wrote:

> I disagree about 'broken': a cache isn't *required* to cache ranges.

I definitely agree that a cache isn't required to cache ranges, but  
right now mod_cache actively forbids the caching of ranges by an  
implementation, and that's the behaviour that's currently broken.

> As for third-party backends, this change is at serious risk of  
> breaking
> anything that has (perfectly reasonably) ignored range responses.
> Fine for trunk, but not for a stable branch.

Good point, in that case I withdraw the backport, this makes sense.


View raw message